March, 2004, Week 2
|
March, 2004, Week 2
|
Monday March 8, 2004 "Loyalty to a petrified opinion never yet broke a chain or freed a human soul." -Mark Twain Mike is home for the rest of the week so Christy put him to work, He is tearing down the drywall in his room so we can put up new and put down a tile floor. His buddy's Mom called to ask if Mike would help teach kids basketball down at High Desert Middle School. I went out and bought a Radar Detector... It seems to work OK. Tuesday March 9, 2004 What has not been examined impartially has not been well examined. Skepticism is therefore the first step toward truth. Denis Diderot (1713-84) We started tearing down the drywall in the living room, we found a nest of mice in the wall, the floor under the bathroom shower is just cut away, there is nothing to prevent the critters from entering the house. "B" leapt to the defense of Monica and pushed Calie who fell and hit her head... she is OK but I am really disappointed in "B". Monica has a serious problem comprehending the story of the Little Boy Who Cried Wolf. Calie is OK but I was concerned for a while... The thumb on Christians right hand is broken, I haven't seen an X-Ray that showed a break so clearly since I saw the one of Robert's broken clavicle. I was looking up a quote and found it on the "Edible Brain" website. The guy that owns it calls himself "Spanky" he says he uses that name to keep himself from getting to swell headed. The reason I mention it is because the three paragraphs below explaining some 'critical thinking' exercises say, very concisely, things that I have tried to say in far too many words.
critical thinking Exercise #1: Check out news stories about the same thing on several websites. Some have a conservative slant, some a liberal slant, some a slant of a different sort (religious, cultural, scientific, Conservative, Liberal, etc.). What makes them different? Who wrote them? Who published them? What is their target audience? Is it the whole truth? Is there something that's not being said? Why would someone hide something? What parts of the story are being emphasized in each version? Why? How do you react to each story? Do you find yourself inclined to believe one story more than another? What is it about you that sees one story more truthful than another when someone else would disagree? Does there seem to be an underlying ulterior motive? Does the article seem 'self serving'? Exercise #2: Look at ads in magazines, newspapers and television. What do they do to make you want the product? Who are they targeting? What hidden messages do you see? What does the ad have to do with the actual product? Examine the brands you use - clothing, cleaning products, food - what brands do you prefer? Why? What do you know about other brands and how they compare? Use the same criteria to analyze political promotional and attack ads. Exercise #3: Invite a friend to have a discussion with you. Tell your friend that you will ask a lot of questions and that even if you agree with your friend you will still question the truth of your friend's belief. Then ask your friend how he/she feels about an explosive subject (abortion, religion, racial stereotyping, etc.). Keep questioning: How do you know? What is your experience? Where did you read that? What is the authority of those that informed you? What makes other authorities of opposing views wrong? The penalty that good men pay for not being interested in politics is to be governed by men worse than themselves. Plato, philosopher (427-347 BCE) I think I have used this observation by Plato before. It is especially relevant today, I am seeing more and more people accept as fact comments, statements, articles and commentary as unbiased fact when just a modicum of research would reveal the lie. There are lies being told from every perspective, half truths, innuendo, presumptions... I wish folks would just spend a minute or two looking into these things. The famous words of King Pyrrhus of Epirus after the bloody battle of Heraclea in 280 BC are as appropriate for America's conquest of Iraq: "One more such victory and we are ruined." Wednesday March 10, 2004 "It is only when we forget all our learning that we begin to know." -Henry David Thoreau The Lancaster kids went on a whale watching trip out of San Pedro today... I rode into Pasadena to attend the 338 Club luncheon, SK Emory was the speaker, I left after he was about 5 minutes into his speech because I had to pick up the kids... besides I had heard the speech before. I joined the Association, I don't know what impact it will have on the grand scheme of things but at least we can stand united and bark every once and a while, I hate the idea of going down without a whimper. SBC is taking advantage of every loophole and caveat in the contract, our Medical expenses have increased from $0.00 to $247.00 a month since 1996. That is getting to be a little scary. The clutch is still slipping on the BMW... damn, $1k to get it replaced... I am not a happy camper. Thursday March 11, 2004 "The recipe for perpetual ignorance is a very simple and effective one: be satisfied with your opinions and content with your knowledge." -Elbert Hubbard We bought some stuff for the Living room, paint, and tools, Christy is pushing hard for me to get done with it, I don't blame her, it's been a long time. I rode the bike again, the clutch is getting worse. I took the bike to the ROF, had a good time, been a while since I really enjoyed myself, it's not the folks that attend, it's me, I get a little tense or something, I have no idea. Maybe it's because I'm not used to having quit drinking beer. It's been since last Thanksgiving since I have had anything alcoholic to drink. I told folks 4 years ago that the Stock Market would take a dive if Bush was elected, no one believed me. We have a government being run by a bunch of MBA types, they have their eyes fixed on the Bottom Line and they are running the country like it was a business. They can't see that they are taking the country into financial and moral ruin. Bush is dictating morality, he isn't supporting causes that don't interest him, he is cutting funding to health care, education the VA. Bush knows what's right for America and what's right for you, he knows how you should vote, where and how you should pray, how to spend your money and when and where and what you should protest. If you feel you are incapable of making these decisions for yourself then, by all means vot for him, but if you feel that your right to worship or not worship is your own, if you fee you have the right to protest when you believe something is wrong with the country, if you feel your tax money should be spent at home not in imperialist quests for power and control of resources... vot him out of office. You remember what it was like in the 80's when all of a sudden we had to 'compete', the old Phone Company died overnight. No more benevolent Mother Bell, the gloves came off and all of a sudden it didn't matter that our mandate was to provide a service, our goal became Profit first last and only. The Bottom Line was GOD and consolidation, layoffs, early retirement, understaffing and customer-be-damned took over. The same thing is happening to the country. They are so focused on looking good that they are letting the infrastructure crumble. The SOB even tried to call fast food hamburger flipping "Manufacturing". They are selling hyperbole and rhetoric and not backing up their promises with money. No child left behind is a joke. They passed laws and set standards and then cut the State education budget so that when children fail there is no way to get them the support they need. Support for veterans was a big deal during the election and then he cut the budget for the VA, VA Hospitals are running on promises, they lost three hospitals in Oregon alone, "We are refocusing on Outpatient Care". Because of Iraq, much of the world now regards America itself as a menacing, unstable threat. President Bush has stuck his head into a hornet's nest. The U.S. will bleed men, money and reputation for a long time before it figures out how to get out of the first colonial misadventure of the 21st century. "I'm the commander - see, I don't need to explain - I don't need to explain why I say things. That's the interesting thing about being the President. Maybe somebody needs to explain to me why they say something, but I don't feel like I owe anybody an explanation." George W. Bush, Washington Post, 11-19-02 Friday March 12, 2004 "Knowledge is a process of piling up facts; wisdom lies in their simplification." Martin H. Fischer Mike and I got about 85% of the drywall up, working with him was a pleasant experience, that's about all I did today. After he got his 'morning bitch session over with Mike was a big help
Saturday March 13, 2004 Q. What do Winnie the Pooh and John the Baptist have in common? A. They both have the same middle name. I saw the first poppy on my property today, right in the middle of the driveway... The cherry trees and other fruit trees are all blooming... I think the rain came at just the right time, Drywall is almost done I will start on the floor tomorrow, it is going to require a lot of work on the radial-arm saw. I wish I could move it into the house for a few days but it would be too dangerous and too much of an obstacle. I listened to a lady interviewing people who voted in the last primary... she was talking to folks who had been interviewed by pollsters. One lady had told the pollster that she would vote for Kucinich, but when the reporter interviewed her she didn't know who Kucinich was. One guy said he was going to vote for Bush because Kerry killed women and children in Vietnam, He had John Kerry confused with Bob Kerrey from Colorado. People vote for and against candidates because of the way they comb their hair, how they dress, their accent, Incredibly ignorant people vote. She interviewed people who didn't have a clue who was even in the race... I don't care if you vote for Bush or Kerry but I would hope you make your decision on fact and not on something you are being told by Rush Limbaugh or Howard Stern... look up the facts, read unbiased reports. Wikipedia, has wonderful articles on both of them... just facts, no opinions, no spin, no proselytizing. Examine what you are being told and weigh the motivation of the speaker before you believe the speech! If you agree with "Trickle Down" economics and perpetual war then go with Bush. Just believe in his philosophy and believe in his motivation. Don't say you'll vote for him because he says he's a good guy. When someone tells you Kerry is a commie, or that he voted down 17 separate weapons systems, or told lies about Vietnam LOOK IT UP!!! It's all on the Net, every move Kerry and Bush have made since they were teenagers is on the Net... If you want to vote against Kerry at least have your facts straight. Kerry and Jane Fonda have never met, Kerry killed a Vietnamese soldier who had aimed a hand held rocket launcher at him. Kerry testified before the Senate to what he had heard seen and done. Kerry voted on one bill in 1988 that affected all those systems because the Cold War was over and the appropriations bill was too large. Sunday March 14, 2004 "You're not supposed to be so blind with patriotism that you can't face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who says it." Malcolm X (Malcolm Little 1925-1965) I did Karen & Blaine's taxes, they get money back this year... finally! Have you been following the activity around the bombings in Spain? The Spanish political elite are playing political games, they are using the deaths of their countrymen to pull of a coup on the opposition party. They are pointing fingers at each other and trying to gain political traction even before all the bodies are buried. I have been reading AP and Reuters about the bombings... the thing that is bothering me is that official responses have been so bland. Where are the eloquent outraged speeches, where is the outpouring of sympathy and resolve that we had after 9/11. Was it Al Qaeda? ETA? If it was Al Qaeda then Europe had better keep a sharp eye out, this is a major escalation for them. America has been a target for years, attacking us on the mainland was a big step and signaled an intensification of terrorist activities around the world. ... I heard a correspondent from Germany say that there has been a sort of ugly unwritten law that Europe will allow a certain amount of autonomy to Middle Eastern types as long as they restrict their terrorist activity to the Middle East. If they were responsible, and it is proven, then the gloves are off. I hope someone without a political axe to grind takes up the gauntlet. We need a Mossad type operation, like the way the Jews went after Nazis. No fanfare, no troop movements, no patriotic rhetoric just cold deadly resolve. Terrorists need to be found in the morning with their throats cut, assassinations, snipers. "suicides". And they have to take on all terrorists, the militant militia's here in the states, KKK, the IRA in all of its configurations, Combat 18, Hamas, GRAPO, Sekigun, ASA, 17N, Shining Path... the list is growing daily. What the US and the UK are doing now is fanning the flames, things are getting worse, and the polarizing affects of our activities is building an army of terrorists with absolutely nothing to lose...
If you are planning for one year, grow rice. If you are planning for 20 years, grow trees. If you are planning for centuries, grow men. Chinese proverb 1. Article by Rev. Rich Lang on "The Imperial Presidency" 2. First article by Eric Margolis that I recall mentioning John Kerry, interesting perspective. 'George Bush and the rise of Christian Fascism' Posted on Monday, March 08 @ 10:10:27 EST (Here's a Reverend I would enjoy listening to... Scroll down to the end and read the "Conclusion" in blue, then, if you want to, read the argument... ) By Rev. Rich LangThe Imperial Presidency The men who wrote the Constitution of the United States knew that if power accrued into the hands of an elite the experiment of democracy (power spread out into the realm of the people) would be over. So they created a system of checks and balances which blocked access to any one person, or any one special interest or elite gaining too much power over others. Thus our executive, legislative and judicial branches of government "balanced" each other. The media was yet another "check" on the accrual of too much power, as was the Bill of Rights, and to some extent the Church (or churches). The system wasn't perfect but it kept alive the possibility of true democracy. It kept alive the dream that one day "we the people" could live in a peaceful commonwealth where every person has what they need to survive and thrive. That dream died in December 2000 when the checks and balances of our Constitution collapsed and George Bush was inserted into the Presidency of the United States. September 11, 2001 furthered the atrophying of democracy handing the country into the hands of an emerging Corporate (and I say Christian) Fascism. Fascism meaning the collapse of diverse spheres of power into one. Since that time we have witnessed, and have been unable to prevent, the emergence of an Imperial Presidency that has the unrestricted power to declare war against any country it chooses. The Imperial Presidency has brought to end the Constitutional mandate that 'ONLY CONGRESS' has the authority to declare war. It has furthered weakened international law and undermined the potential of the United Nations to spread democracy throughout the earth. The Imperial Presidency has also gained unrestricted potential to round up American citizens incarcerating them in military brigs or concentration camps for unlimited amounts of time. The presidency can keep the accused from ever again communicating with friends, families, and attorneys, simply on the certification that the incarcerated are "terrorists," as he has done with Jose Padilla and Yaser Esam Hamdi. The Presidency may also now kill American citizens abroad solely on the basis of naming the one killed "a terrorist". Just ask the family and friends of Ahmed Hijazi, anAmerican killed with a U.S.-fired missile in Yemen. This nullifies the Constitutional right: "no person shall be denied life, liberty or property without due process of law." Ominous signs are all around us concerning the accrual of power into the hands of the Presidency. If Mr. Bush stays in office I think our future will continue to witness shrinking political rights, financial collapse and endless war. Part of the power and seduction of this administration emerges from its diabolical manipulation of Christian rhetoric. I want to flesh out the ideology of the Christian Fascism that Mr. Bush articulates. It is a form of Christianity that is the mirror opposite of what Jesus embodied. It is, indeed, the materialization of the spirit of antichrist: a perversion of Christian faith and practice. Christian Fascism This country, like it or not, is overwhelmingly dominated by the ideology of the Christian story. It is not so much that our founders were all Christians. Rather, they lived in an atmosphere which was visioned through the lens of Christian thought and rhetoric. What they saw was that America had become the New Israel (the new Promised Land) of God. America was a benevolent nation seeking only the good of all. Our wealth is a blessing given to us as a sign that we are a "chosen, special people" whose larger meaning is to help the world into an era of peace, prosperity and justice. Every politician draws on this "civil religion story" of benevolence which gives authority to the politicians ambition and agenda. Another way of saying this is: every nation needs sacred legitimation. It needs the authority of transcendence: of a story larger than itself ... a story that connects past with present and future. An Empire needs an even broader story: one that connects with cosmic and/or historical redemption and new creation. Martin Luther King understood this sacred American civil religion and was able to wed it brilliantly with the prophetic religious teachings of the Bible. He drew upon Biblical narratives which limited the power and authority of the elite while calling for economic redistribution of wealth. He drew upon teachings rooted in the personal morality of nonviolence and compassion. George Bush, on the other hand, also understands this sacred American 'civic gospel' and has brilliantly merged it with Biblical Holiness and Holy War traditions. These traditions call for the emergence of the Righteous Warrior who will cleanse the land of its impurity. These traditions are rooted in the personal morality of righteous zeal and obedience. For example: Mr. Bush consistently sends signals to his right wing religious base. In the 2003 State of the Union he exhorted: "there's power, wonder working power, in the goodness and idealism and faith of the American people". It's a phrase from a well known Communion hymn "there's power, wonder working power in the blood of the lamb". Bush brings together the holiness zeal of Christian evangelicalism with patriotic fundamentalism. The core belief system of this 'civic gospel' goes something like this: The United States was founded as a Christian nation with free enterprise as the only economic system truly compatible with Christian beliefs. These religious values are today under attack in America. The danger is that without faith in God America will lose its blessing. Therefore, the government needs to act to protect the nation's religious heritage. Mr. Bush's teachings on terrorism: "you are with us or against us" cements for the hearer the apocalyptic world of good versus evil. There can be no neutral ground. You have to make a decision. Patriotism is now all or nothing: it is either total agreement or a slippery slope towards treason. In the Church you come to Jesus alone for salvation. In the state you obey the God-annointed leader and are thereby secured. Renana Brooks writes (The Nation June 24, 2003: Bush Dominates A Nation of Victims): "Bush is a master at inducing learned helplessness in the electorate. He uses pessimistic language that creates fear and disables people from feeling they can solve their problems. In his September 20, 2001 speech to Congress on the 9/11 attacks, he chose to increase people's sense of vulnerability: 'Americans should not expect one battle, but a lengthy campaign, unlike any other we have ever seen. ... I ask you to live your lives, and hug your children. I know many citizens have fears tonight ... Be calm and resolute, even in the face of a continuing threat.' (Subsequent terror alerts .. have maintained and expanded this fear of unknown, sinister enemies.)" The terror threat itself can only be combated with increases in military force, domestic security and curtailment of civil rights through Patriot Acts. There are no other options nor any dialogue or debate that would create an alternative way to deal with terrorism. 3.) Mr. Bush certainly sees himself as a Messiah figure. Listen to his language after 9-11: " I will not forget this wound to our country or those who inflicted it. I will not yield; I will not rest; I will not relent in waging this struggle for freedom and security for the American people." Or, in his 2003 State of the Union speech: "I will defend the freedom and security of the American people". He has become the nation. He is its embodiment. According to Palestinian Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas, - Bush told him: "God told me to strike at al Qaida and I struck them, and then he instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did, and now I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East. If you help me I will act, and if not, the elections will come and I will have to focus on them." This is Biblical language ... it isn't political script. This is Bush's soul language. He understands himself as a man with a Divine mission. It also means that for him leadership is not "representing the people" rather leadership means transcending the will of the people. George Bush already knows the truth before the evidence is presented. He is guided by God and must blaze the trial even if the people are reluctant. Iraq, for example, was a necessary war whether or not Saddam had nukes. Saddam, for Bush, was a bad guy who tried to kill "my dad". The war, for Bush, was holy and justified and necessary. Purging evil is necessary in the Holiness/Holy War tradition of the Bible. The righteous will purge evil but the unrighteous will be consumed by it. Like all religions the Bible has various narratives within its pages: Jesus drew on the prophetic traditions that called upon the people to change their way of life even as it critiqued and called upon the elites to decentralize their power. Jesus role modeled a lifestyle of redemptive suffering on behalf of others. Mr. Bush, however, draws on traditions that call for purity and cleansing. It is a language of hostility towards enemies and a strident call for obedience. It calls forth a lifestyle of the RIGHTEOUS ONE who will purge evil from the world through sacred violence. This religious rhetoric, which merges Holiness Christianity with Imperial Americanism, is "in sync" with a growing new movement in theology called Christian Reconstructionism (or Dominion Theology). Reconstructed Fascism First and most basic is that Dominion Theology wants to replace democracy with a theocratic elite that would govern according to a very literal and peculiar interpretation of Biblical law. The disciples of Jesus are to have "dominion" over all of creation. It is the role of the Church to rule over the wicked and bring them into the obedience of faith. In a "reconstructed society" democracy would be heresy. The division between sacred and secular would be abolished. A new insistence on conformity to moral rules would replace the pluralism we now know. The purpose of the Federal government would be to enforce morality through military and police functions. Society would be regulated by a theocratic elite: in the words of Pat Robertson: "just as the Supreme Court justices place a hand on the Bible and swear to uphold the Constitution, so they should also put a hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible." We see this at play in the leanings of Supreme Court Justices Scalia and Thomas. Against the common assumption that we are a secular state Mr. Scalia has said (in a FIRST THINGS: May 2002 ) "government ... derives its moral authority from God. Government is the minister of God with powers to revenge, to execute wrath, including wrath by the sword." Scalia is drawing from Romans 13. If taken literally the implication of those verses would prohibit any resistance against the policies of a government. No more peaceful demonstrations (the government would be justified to do what it did to those recently in Miami and earlier here in Seattle). Even writings of dissent and opposition could be labeled treasonous (this is part of Ashcroft's passion for Patriot Acts and other warnings not to say too much). Scalia (and many of the conservative judges placed in Federal Courts since Reagan) believe in interpreting the Constitution in its original intent. As Scalia has said (same article as above) "the constitution that I interpret and apply is not living but dead. It means today not what current society ..thinks it ought to mean, but what it meant when it was adopted." So, as Katherine Yurica points out in her article THE DESPOILING OF AMERICA: .. since the death penalty was clearly permitted when the 8th Amendment (which prohibits cruel and unusual punishments) was adopted and at that time the death penalty was applied for all felonies --- including, for example, the felony of horse-thieving, "so it is clearly permitted today". All a willing Dominionist Republican controlled congress need do to extend the death penalty to those people who practice witchcraft, adultery, homosexuality, heresy, etc. is to find those particular death penalty laws existing as of November 3, 1791 and re-instate them. Scalia further believes that democracy fosters civil disobedience and is therefore a hindrance to the greater good of law and order. Our Federal Court system is being packed with these types of Judges ... Bush himself will try to fill Court vacancies with these type of judges. Secondly: The good society according to Dominion Theology has men on top. Society would be reconstructed into a strong patriarchy that would provide the social pressure ensuring conformity. Women would find their true function as supportive wives, mothers and homemakers. Those outside this "patriarchal modality" would be exterminated. (Today the Gay marriage movement is a true threat to establishing a patriarchal society. This administration has no choice but to make this a MAJOR issue in the coming election.). Thirdly: Purity becomes very important. There is only one right way to see the world. It is therefore of fundamental importance to control education in all spheres of culture. We see this in the Bush administration's approach to testing in schools; in his massive discounting of Global warming and in his repeated refusals to engage in open, diversified conversation about matters of importance: whether it be Cheney's Energy Task Force, the investigation of 9/11; or the creation of an "in house" intelligence team which created evidence for the Iraqi war after the other governmental agencies couldn't provide it. The Bush team KNEW the answers before the evidence was even accumulated. Fourth: Dominion Theology denies history and spurns the modern. It is not a conservative (conserving) movement. Although it might appeal to a nostalgic and mythical past it is primarily focused on a radically, revolutionized future of utopia. It assumes that the end will justify the means and it is moral to work as "stealth agents" fooling the pagans. It sees the world as engaged in spiritual warfare pitting "good Christians" against everybody else. This HOLY WAR and HOLINESS rhetoric is foundational in Mr. Bush's worldview. Now if you think that this talk is bit "hyper" on my part ... that I'm Chicken Little squawking in the wind ... what then do you make of these Texas Republican platform positions of 2002 ??? "The Republican Party of Texas reaffirms the United States of America is a Christian nation. Government: We reclaim freedom of religious expression in public on government property, and freedom from government interference. Support government display of Ten Commandments. ... Dispel the "myth" of separation of church and state. ECONOMY: Abolish the dollar in favor of the gold standard. Abolish the IRS. Eliminate income tax, inheritance tax, gift tax, capital gains, corporate income tax, payroll tax and property tax. Repeal minimum wage law ...Gradually phase out Social security tax for a system of private pensions. UNITED NATIONS: We immediately rescind our membership in , as well as financial and military contributions to the United Nations ... we should evict the United Nations... FAMILY: We believe that traditional marriage is a legal and moral commitment between a man and a woman. We recognize that the family is the foundational unit of a healthy society and consists of those related by blood, marriage or adoption. The family is responsible for its own welfare, education, moral training, conduct and property. EDUCATION: Since Secular Humanism is recognized by the United States Supreme Court as a religion ... Secular Humanism should be subjected to the same state and federal laws as any other recognized religion. ENVIRONMENT: Oppose the myth of global warming. Reaffirm the belief in the fundamental right of an individual to use property without governmental interference. This coming election will not be decided because of political policy. It will not be decided in a debate over free markets versus fair markets; tax cuts or no tax cuts, Patriot Act or no Patriot Act; military draft or no draft. None of these issues will determine the election because the candidates are all for free markets, tax cuts, domestic security and a strong global military presence. The election will be determined by the candidate who can embody the deeply felt, often unarticulated religious yearnings of the populace. Yearnings such as "who will save us, secure us, lead us??? who will connect us with a power greater than the terrors of the night?" Bush speaks this language. Democrats are stuck in political nuance. Or, in other words, Democrats cannot speak the language of Martin Luther King who understood that social transformation requires a transcendent authority. And it is a vision of transformation, not nuance, that gives people courage to risk alternative paths to violence. The problem comes down to this: Democrats, liberals, and social progressives have simply not grasped how afraid, insecure and how deeply in despair the populace is. They keep speaking as if tinkering with the system is a vision that can win the day. What Bush and Rove, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz and Pearls, Abrams and Bolton, DeLay and Rice etc, have clearly understood is that truth is perception. Image is EVERYTHING! Unfortunately, the inner person of America today is a hollowed out consumer who lacks the will power, stamina and imagination to do anything more than be overwhelmed by appearances. Therefore, a politics of crisis, a politics of fear will keep us locked into a state of conformity. Apocalyptic Fascism Fueling this politics of fear is yet another theological worldview of crisis and insecurity. Apocalyptic theology is booming !!! Drawing from the Holiness/Holy War traditions of the Bible it currently dominates the mass media expression of Christian faith from which Bush draws his strength. It is a theology of despair that has given up on the possibilities of redemption. One of the most popular fiction series making the rounds these days is the LEFT BEHIND series written by Tim LaHaye & Jerry Jenkins. Multiple millions of people are reading these books which fictionalize the end of life as we know it. It used to be that the Church could control people through the fear of eternal damnation. Today it is through fear of the future. The theology is basically this: The Bible is a code book that when rightly interpreted reveals that we are living at the end of history. History is scripted and is about to come to a catastrophic conclusion. The only hope is to accept Jesus as your personal Lord and Savior so that you can be "saved" from the future apocalypse. God will "snatch you up" (Rapture) right before a seven year series of horrible events that will see the rise of Antichrist and the rebuilding of the Jewish temple. There will be world war with most of humanity dying. At that point Jesus will return to restore law and order. This theology of despair "fits" our current culture of powerlessness and fear. From SARS to weapons of mass destruction to the ongoing Palestinian-Israeli conflict, to ecological collapse, the whole world seems to be on a "no exit" slide into an end times abyss. The theology of despair is very seductive and it is shaping the spirituality of millions of Christians today. It has, at least, five political implications that affect each one of us here today. FIRST: Israel is to be exalted and defended no matter what they do to the Palestinian people. They are God's chosen people and must reside in their Biblically anointed Land for the "end time clock" to tick to its final minute. Israel has a Biblical mandate to conquer and control all of the land from the Nile River to the Euphrates. Behind the politics of oil lie the religious passion to fulfill God's will: Syria must fall. SECOND: institutions like the United Nations are not to be trusted because they are tools of the Antichrist. The Antichrist is thought of (not as a spirituality or ideology) but as a personal embodiment of evil. The Antichrist will be a living person who will come to power at the end of history and proclaim himself to be god on earth. The theory has it that his power will be generated from within a coalition of nations. Thus ... America, as God's chosen nation, will need to go it alone so as not to be duped by Antichrist. Our destiny is to take the gospel to all the nations: a benevolent gospel of security and salvation for all. THIRD: since the world is passing away the environment is not of great importance. There is no need to worry about issues of sustainability because the world is in its final countdown. Part of the unconcern towards global warming and other ecological crisis is the religious belief that we aren't going to be around in 100 years. We're in the end times now ... every moment is merely preparation for eternity. Whether Bushhimself believes this or not is irrelevant. This is the religious worldview of those who exalt him and the voter-bloc to which he plays. For Bush to act for sustainability would require a major shift in his religious narrative. ... As an aside this past summer the National Park Service was instructed to approve the display of religious symbols and Bible verses, as well as the sale of creationist books at the Grand Canyon National Park. In December 2003 the Park Service was ordered to develop a "more balanced" version of an 8 minute video shown at the Lincoln Memorial Visitor Center. Conservative Christians wanted the removal of footage of gay rights, pro choice and anti-war demonstrations replacing it with footage of Christian rallies and pro-war demonstrations. FOURTH: Apocalyptic theology believes that Jesus dying for my sins is far more important than the teachings of Jesus. We see this in the recent movie PASSION OF THE CHRIST. What this creates is a spirituality that can overlook the teachings of Jesus. The Sermon on the Mount is re-framed as an impossible this-worldly ethic. Teachings about nonviolence, economic redistribution, compassion toward those who are thought of as sinners and resistance to injustice are all discounted. Recently, the Governor of Alabama in a fit of religious zeal wanted to take the economic teachings of Jesus seriously: he tried to reform his state to benefit the poor. The Christian Coalition led the charge against such thinking and foiled his efforts. FIFTH: a leader who loves Jesus is to be followed as God's man for the hour. The Christian leader is God's shepherd over the American flock. When Bush, who sees himself as a messianic figure anointed by God, decided on running for the Presidency he called a group of evangelical Pastors together announcing to them "I have heard the call" and then received from them the "laying on of hands" which corresponds to divine ordination for the task ahead. On September 14, 2001 he stated: "our responsibility before history is already clear: to answer these attacks and rid the world of evil". He then launched the crusade Operation Infinite Freedom against Afghanistan. Yet other messianic statements from Bush: "History has called America to action. ... The great hope of our time, and the great hope of every time, now depends on us." .... "We must also remember our calling as a blessed nation to make the world better ... and confound the designs of evil men." "Our nation has been chosen by God and commissioned by history, to be a model of justice before the world." *** According to Vice-President Cheney: America "has the duty to act with force to construct a world in the image of the United States." In return for this messianic leadership evangelical Christians have poured out an anointing of prayer. During the Afghanistan crusade thousands of "Presidential Circles of Prayer" and "Wheels of Prayer" were organized on the Internet, running 24 hours a day. WHEEL OF PRAYER FOR OUR SOLDIERSThis prayer was so popular and was hit so often that the website crashed within days. Pastor Charles Stanley distributed among Marines as they entered into combat thousands of pamphlets entitled "Duty of a Christian in Time of War". With the pamphlet went a card instructing them to sign and send directly to Mr. Bush. The card says: "I have committed to pray for you, your family and your Administration." Specific prayers for the President were included for each day. CONCLUSION: The point I'm trying to make is that we are not dealing simply with politics when it comes to the Bush administration. The progressive left, which often pays little attention to Christianity, and the moderate middle, which thinks "these things will balance out"; will be making a huge mistake if they overlook the religious ideology at the core of Mr. Bush personally and the movement he represents. And we are talking about a "movement" (a movement of 'the people' not just the elites). We are seeing today the emergence of a "fascist movement". It is bankrolled and organized by Corporations, and articulated through the ideology of neo-conservatism. But the troops come out of the right wing church. And that church, drawing upon the Holiness/Holy War Biblical narratives of Apocalyptic-Dominionism theology, is growing in this country. This is not a battle between intellectual and institutional elites. It is far more intimate than that. It's a battle in our homes, our families, friendships, neighborhoods and within our faith communities. Let me make a rather audacious prophecy: WHOEVER CONTROLS THE INTERPRETATION OF SCRIPTURE WILL CONTROL THE FUTURE OF THIS NATION. In other words it's the vision of Pat Robertson or Martin Luther King. When Dave Korten (author of When Corporations Rule the World) says that we need a "new story"; he is talking about needing a transcendent authority in which we root our political culture. Human beings cannot live in societal form without a sacred narrative. Neither anarchy nor atheism can construct a house that will hold our future. The Republicans know this well. But the Democrats seem clueless. What we need is a movement of spiritual justice. We need the language of those who can wed America's civil religion with Biblical prophetic narrative. We need to expand that language so that it can include the language and stories that are emerging from the antiwar, fair trade and human rights movements. Together this language can form a unique new narrative that has the power to inspire imagination and courage. A language that can call forth a new coalition powerful enough to envision a new and better world. It will be a language that articulates "we are the ones we are looking for". A language that proclaims "God with us in our diversity" not God above us threatening wrath and ruin. Rev. Rich Lang is pastor of the Trinity United Methodist Church in Seattle, Washington Copyright: Eric S. Margolis, 2004
The U.S. won an inevitable military triumph, but political victory remains elusive Posted on Sunday, March 14 @ 09:26:38 EST
By Eric Margolis, Toronto Sun WASHINGTON -- The famous words of King Pyrrhus of Epirus after the bloody battle of Heraclea in 280 BC are as appropriate for America's conquest of Iraq: "One more such victory and we are ruined." The March, 2003 invasion of Iraq pitted the world's greatest military power against the largely inoperative army of a small, dilapidated nation of only 17 million (deducting rebellious Kurds), crushed by 12 years of sanctions and bombing. Thanks to total air superiority, invading U.S. forces achieved a brilliant feat of logistics, racing from Kuwait to Northern Iraq in under three weeks. The 15% of Iraq's army that stood and fought was pulverized by massive, co-ordinate U.S. air strikes and artillery barrages. Urban resistance failed to materialize. The rout of Iraq's forces recalled another colonial war, the Dervish Campaign of 1898. Gen. Kitchener led the imperial British Army far up the Nile into Sudan where it met and massacred a primitive Islamic host at Omdurman. Britain's quick-fire guns and artillery mowed down Dervish cavalry and sword-waving "fuzzy-wuzzies" as murderously as U.S. precision munitions vapourized Iraqi units. U.S. air and ground forces in Iraq displayed superb technical, electronic, logistic and combat prowess confirming they are two full military generations ahead of nearly all other nations. But as the great modern military thinker, Maj.-Gen J.F.C. Fuller, observed 40 years ago, the proper objective of war is not military victory but a politically advantageous peace. While the U.S. won an inevitable military victory against a nearly helpless Iraq, political victory so far remains elusive. Primary objectives In my view, two primary objectives drove the U.S. invasion of Iraq: oil and its support for Israel. White House claims about weapons of mass destruction and terrorism were propaganda smoke screens. President George Bush's claims that impotent Iraq posed "a grave and gathering danger" to the U.S., Condoleezza Rice's hysterical warnings about "mushroom clouds over the U.S.," and Vice President Dick Cheney's bizarre jeremiads about "Iraq's reconstituted nuclear weapons" were absurd. The U.S. imports little oil from the Mideast or Central Asia. However, these regions are primary oil sources for Europe and Japan - and, increasingly, for India and China. By dominating these oil sources, the U.S. controls the economies of its main commercial and potential military rivals. Control of the Muslim world's oil is the principal pillar of America's world power. The Pentagon plans three permanent major military bases in Iraq from which powerful garrisons of U.S. air and ground forces, backed by mercenary native troops, will police not just Iraq but the entire Mideast and guard the new "imperial lifeline" of pipelines exporting oil from Central Asia and the Arab world. Other U.S. bases in Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Pakistan, linked to bases in Bulgaria and Romania, will guard the new imperial route. The second objective, in my view, was aiding Israel. Influential American supporters of Israel's rightist prime minister, Ariel Sharon, played a significant role in building the case for war against Iraq. From various positions in the White House, Pentagon, National Security Council, media, and taxpayer-supported Washington think tanks, these neo-conservatives helped to orchestrate the campaign about Iraq's non-existent weapons of mass destruction and trumpeted alleged threats from Iraq. Mini-states The neo-cons achieved their objective: Iraq, once the Arab world's most developed, industrialized nation, a bitter foe of Israel, was destroyed, and will likely end up split into three weak mini-states. Israel is a primary beneficiary of the Iraq war: a potential nuclear rival was eliminated by the U.S. Many neo-cons believed crushing Iraq would help to cement Israel's grip on the occupied West Bank and Golan, thwart a Palestinian state and force the Arab nations to accept Israel's regional hegemony. But for the United States, Iraq was at best a pyrrhic victory. Invading and occupying Iraq has proven to be a financial disaster. The invasion cost $105 billion US in direct expenses - the price of five complete carrier battle groups, or one million low-cost apartments. Occupying Iraq costs $9 billion monthly. Pre-war neo-con plans to finance the occupation by plundering Iraq's oil have been frustrated by sabotage. Congress estimates the overall cost of "pacifying" and "rebuilding" Iraq for fiscal 2003 and 2004 at a staggering $200 billion. This money will have to be borrowed by the empty treasury, which, thanks to Bush's reckless "war" spending, is running huge deficits heading toward $400 billion, risking an explosion of inflation that threatens to undermine the long-term bond market and further weaken the dollar. The human cost of the war continues to rise. As of this writing, U.S. losses amount to 555 dead, and about 9,000 casualties from combat, accidents and serious illnesses. Ten thousand Iraqi civilians were estimated to have been killed by U.S. forces - in a war now described as waged under "mistaken intelligence assumptions." Iraqi military casualties are 6,000-10,000. Iraq lies in ruins. "Rebuilding Iraq" means paying for all the damage caused by massive U.S. bombing and years of sanctions. Puppet regime In spite of rosy claims from the White House about handing sovereignty to Iraqis, American troops will garrison Iraq for years to guard the oil fields and maintain a "democratic" puppet regime in power in Baghdad that obeys Washington's orders. U.S. forces will continue to face a simmering, low-grade guerrilla war that will kill or wound more American troops, and increasingly brutalize and corrupt occupation forces - the inevitable result of all colonial wars. In short, America now has its own West Bank, or Lebanon. The brazen arrogance and profound ignorance shown by the Bush administration in its crusade against Iraq has turned the world against the United States. Occupied Iraq is acting as a terrorism generator. For the next generation of young Muslims, Iraq is becoming what Afghanistan was in the 1980s, a rallying point to fight foreign occupation, battle imperialism and defend the tattered honour of the Muslim world. Bush and his men have created millions of new enemies. Half of all U.S. ground combat forces are tied down in and around Iraq. Reserves are being mobilized for long tours. Wear and tear on overstretched U.S. forces and their heavy equipment is a grave, though little discussed, problem. Neo-con promises of "liberation" of Iraq, of joyous, flower-tossing crowds and of rapid "democratization" have turned to dust. Iraq remains a dangerous, volatile mess seething with violence and implacable Shia political demands. Twenty resistance groups now battle U.S. and allied occupation troops. Militant Islamic jihadis are heading for Iraq to fight "Great Satan" America. Yet Bush still claims invading Iraq made America safer. However, because of Iraq, much of the world now regards America itself as a menacing, unstable threat. President Bush has stuck his head into a hornet's nest. The U.S. will bleed men, money and reputation for a long time before it figures out how to get out of the first colonial misadventure of the 21st century. Eric can be reached by e-mail at margolis@foreigncorrespondent.com.
Posted on Saturday, March 13 @ 08:47:43 EST |
