July Week 1, 2006

Home Up July Week 2, 2006 July Week 3, 2006 July Week 4, 2006 July Week 5, 2006

Home Up January Week 1, 2006 February Week 1, 2006 March Week 1, 2006 April Week 1, 2006 May Week 1, 2006 June Week 1, 2006 July Week 1, 2006 August Week 1, 2006 September Week 1, 2006 October Week 1, 2006 November Week 1, 2006 December Week 1, 2006

Saturday  July 1 , 2006

After the game, the king and pawn go into the same box.

Italian Proverb

Lots of running around today... nothing constructive accomplished... I did beat my Mother-in-law at Scrabble though so the day wasn't a total loss.

Interesting that the Administration is making a federal case out of the New York Times 'divulging' the already obvious to anyone with a brain that the US is monitoring money being sent overseas... the problem as I see it isn't that we are monitoring money going to Terrorists, we are monitoring all money going overseas without regard to who is sending it or where it is going... It is monitoring all bank transactions just like it was monitoring phone calls... it's illegal... besides, if they are going to go after the Times they have to go after Bush too:

Public comments of George W. Bush, regarding the tracking of terrorist finances:

  1. 9/24/01:
    "Today we have launched a strike on the financial foundation of the global terror network."

  2. 10/10/01:
    "The American people must understand that we're making great progress on other fronts, that we're halting their money."

  3. 11/7/01:
    "From the mountains of Afghanistan to the bank accounts of terrorist organizations."

  4. 12/20/01:
    "The assets of more than 150 known terrorists, their organizations and their bankers have been frozen by the United States."

  5. 11/25/02:
    "We're trackin' terrorist activity, we're freezin' terrorist finances, we're disrupting terrorist plots."

  6. 3/23/04:
    "We've got a strong network of cooperative governments trying to chase down terrorist money and prevent that money from being spread around to cause harm."

  7. 4/19/04:
    "Part of the way to make sure that we catch terrorists is we chase money trails."

Video of Bush making above comments

Plus the agency doing the monitoring has it's own Website http://www.swift.com/ their reaction to the Times article here http://www.swift.com/index.cfm?item_id=59897

"Let us begin by underscoring SWIFT’s commitment to the highest standards of integrity, confidentiality and availability of the messaging data we transmit on behalf of our members and users. "

I know I feel comforted by their assurances... damn.

...and they have monthly publications (The Swift Globe and The Dialogue Magazine... also an Annual Report) that I am sure are also informative... 

I am very concerned that we are headed in a direction that will so alienate us from the rest of the world that we will become an isolated giant. We don't try to understand the world we just try to control it. I don't like us very much. Our people are already paranoid as hell and we are losing control of our government. The Bush Administration had assumed powers that are going to destroy us. I believe that business controls the Whitehouse and business has no soul, Business cares only about growth and profit, if you are standing in its way you will be crushed... they will do and say anything to divert our attention from what they are doing.

Sunday  July 2 , 2006

The further one grows spiritually, the more and more people one loves and the fewer and fewer people one likes.

Gale D. Webbe, clergyman and author (1909-2000)

I did laundry, listened to a race and watched Garrison Keillor on TV... whoop-de-do... another thrill packed day at the Daggett's.

I also read a very good speech by Barack Obama... a powerful speaker... some day I hope he's in the Oval Office. There is an element in our society, a tiny, cancerous, pustule of our population that would destroy him if they could. They are of the Arian Brotherhood, KKK, White Socialist Party ilk who, out of arrogance, bigotry and ignorance place the blame for their impotence on people they consider alien and inferior.

America doesn't deserve Obama unless it can wipe out the McVeigh's in their midst. 

Home Up July Week 2, 2006 July Week 3, 2006 July Week 4, 2006 July Week 5, 2006

July 02, 2006

Rediscovering faith and 'getting preachy'


Many Democrats discovered God in the 2004 exit polls.

Specifically, they looked at the importance of religious voters to President Bush's majority and decided: We need some of those folks. Off Democrats went to their Bibles, finding every verse they could -- there are many -- describing the imperative to help the poor, battle injustice and set the oppressed free.

Now human beings often find God in unexpected places, so why shouldn't the exit polls be this era's answer to the burning bush? And a lot of Democrats insist, fairly, that they were people of faith long before the results of 2004 were tabulated.

Yet there is often a terrible awkwardness among Democratic politicians when their talk turns to God, partly because they also know how important secular voters are to their coalition. When it comes to God, it's hard to triangulate.

So when a religious Democrat speaks seriously about the relationship of faith to politics, the understandable temptation is to see him as counting not his blessings but his votes. Thus did the Associated Press headline its early stories about Barack Obama's speech to religious progressives on Wednesday: "Obama: Democrats Must Court Evangelicals."

Well, yes, Obama, the senator from Illinois who causes all kind of Democrats to swoon, did indeed criticize "liberals who dismiss religion in the public square as inherently irrational or intolerant." But a purely electoral reading of Obama's speech to the Call to Renewal conference here misses the point of what may be the most important pronouncement by a Democrat on faith and politics since John F. Kennedy's Houston speech in 1960 declaring his independence from the Vatican. (You can decide on Obama's speech yourself: The text can be found at www.obama.senate.gov/speech.)

Here's what stands out. First, Obama's offers the first faith testimony I have heard from any politician that speaks honestly about the uncertainties of belief. "Faith doesn't mean that you don't have doubts," Obama declared. "You need to come to church in the first place precisely because you are first of this world, not apart from it."

In an interview on Thursday, Obama didn't back away. "By definition, faith admits doubt," he said. "Otherwise, it isn't faith. . . . If we don't sometimes feel hopeless, then we're really insulating ourselves from the world around us."

On the matter of church-state separation, Obama doesn't propose some contrived balancing act but embraces religion's need for independence from government. In a direct challenge to "conservative leaders," he argued that "they need to understand the critical role that the separation of church and state has played in preserving not only our democracy, but also the robustness of our religious practice."

"Folks tend to forget," he continued, "that during our founding, it wasn't the atheists or the civil libertarians who were the most effective champions of the First Amendment" but "persecuted minorities" such as Baptists "who didn't want the established churches to impose their views."

Like most liberals who are religious, Obama finds a powerful demand for social justice embedded in the great faith traditions. He took a swipe at those who would repeal the estate tax, saying this entailed "a trillion dollars being taken out of social programs to go to a handful of folks who don't need and weren't even asking for it."

But he insisted that social improvement also requires individual transformation. When a gang member "shoots indiscriminately into a crowd . . . there's a hole in that young man's heart -- a hole that the government alone cannot fix." Contraception can reduce teen pregnancy rates, but so can "faith and guidance" which "help fortify a young woman's sense of self, a young man's sense of responsibility and a sense of reverence that all young people should have for the act of sexual intimacy."

And if you think this sounds preachy, Obama has an answer: "Our fear of getting 'preachy' may also lead us to discount the role that values and culture play in some of our most urgent social problems."

"No matter how religious they may or may not be," Obama said, "people are tired of seeing faith used as a tool of attack. They don't want faith used to belittle or to divide. They're tired of hearing folks deliver more screed than sermon."

I think I hear some rousing "Amens!" out there -- from Republicans no less than from Democrats.