Friday December 1 , 2006
It takes two to speak the truth: one to speak, and another to hear.
Henry David Thoreau, naturalist and author (1817-1862)
Christy and I went into Colville and did some more shopping and bought a piece for the breathing machine Monica uses when she has an Asthma attack.
I watched Calie play two games, she played half a game in Metaline Falls with the JV team and about 5 minutes with the Varsity Girls at Selkirk High... they won the JV game easily but lost the Varsity game by one basket in a really good game against the Cusick Bulldogs.
I think the most intriguing aspect of this article is that it surprises anyone. Walk into just about any bar or VFW Post in America and you can hear some Ditto Brained pinhead espouse the same hateful solutions to the problem. That did not exist before the BWII (Bush War II)... it's pretty scary. This country has been in denial since 9/11 and before. We are the most uninformed, gullible, apathetic, ignorant nation on the planet.
Saturday December 2 , 2006
Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves.
Carl Jung
Christian made a date to meet a girl at the movie and then decided not to go... I told Mike to take him. Cindy and I went to the Cutter thearter and watched and listened to a group of guys called I Tromboni. They play trombones, they are really excellent, I had a good time..
Sunday December 3 , 2006
I expect to pass through this world but once, any good thing, therefore, that I can do, let me do it now…for I shall not pass this way again.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Between taking Monica to Practice and Calie to her boyfriends house I watched as much Football as I could.
Bush is in denial
By Robert Fisk
12/01/06 "The
Independent" -- -- More than half a million deaths, an army
trapped in the largest military debacle since Vietnam, a Middle East policy
already buried in the sands of Mesopotamia - and still George W Bush is in
denial. How does he do it? How does he persuade himself - as he apparently
did in Amman yesterday - that the United States will stay in Iraq "until the
job is complete"? The "job" - Washington's project to reshape the Middle
East in its own and Israel's image - is long dead, its very neoconservative
originators disavowing their hopeless political aims and blaming Bush, along
with the Iraqis of course, for their disaster.
History's "deniers" are many - and all subject to the same folly: faced with
overwhelming evidence of catastrophe, they take refuge in fantasy,
dismissing evidence of collapse as a symptom of some short-term setback,
clinging to the idea that as long as their generals promise victory - or
because they have themselves so often promised victory - that fate will be
kind. George W Bush - or Lord Blair of Kut al-Amara for that matter - need
not feel alone. The Middle East has produced these fantasists by the
bucketful over past decades.
In 1967, Egyptian president Gamel Abdul Nasser insisted his country was
winning the Six Day War hours after the Israelis had destroyed the entire
Egyptian air force on the ground. President Carter was extolling the Shah's
Iran as "an island of stability in the region" only days before Ayatollah
Khomeini's Islamic revolution brought down his regime. President Leonid
Brezhnev declared a Soviet victory in Afghanistan when Russian troops were
being driven from their fire bases in Nangahar and Kandahar provinces by
Osama bin Laden and his fighters.
And was it not Saddam Hussein who promised the "mother of all battles" for
Kuwait before the great Iraqi retreat in 1991? And was it not Saddam again
who predicted a US defeat in the sands of Iraq in 2003? Saddam's loyal
acolyte, Mohamed el-Sahaf, would fantasise about the number of American
soldiers who would die in the desert; George W Bush let it be known that he
sometimes slipped out of White House staff meetings to watch Sahaf's
preposterous performance and laugh at the fantasies of Iraq's minister of
information.
So who is laughing at Bush now? Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, almost
as loyal a retainer to Bush as Sahaf was to Saddam, receives the same false
praise from the American president that Nasser and Brezhnev once lavished
upon their generals. "I appreciate the courage you show during these
difficult times as you lead your country," Bush tells Maliki. "He's the
right guy for Iraq," he tells us. And the Iraqi Prime Minister who hides in
the US-fortified "Green Zone" - was ever a crusader fortress so aptly named?
- announces that "there is no problem". Power must be more quickly
transferred to Maliki, we were informed yesterday. Why? Because that will
save Iraq? Or because this will allow America to claim, as it did when it
decided to allow the South Vietnamese army to fight on its own against
Hanoi, that Washington is not to blame for the debacle that follows? "One of
his frustrations with me is that he believes that we've been slow about
giving him the tools necessary to protect the Iraqi people." Or so Bush
says. "He doesn't have the capacity to respond. So we want to accelerate
that capacity." But how can Maliki have any "capacity" at all when he rules
only a few square miles of central Baghdad and a clutch of rotting ex-Baathist
palaces?
About the only truthful statement uttered in Amman yesterday was Bush's
remark that "there's a lot of speculation that these reports in Washington
mean there's going to be some kind of graceful exit out of Iraq [but] this
business about a graceful exit just simply has no realism to it at all."
Indeed, it has not. There can be no graceful exit from Iraq, only a
terrifying, bloody collapse of military power. The withdrawal of Shia
ministers from Maliki's cabinet mirror the withdrawal of Shia ministers from
another American-supported administration in Beirut - where the Lebanese
fear an equally appalling conflict over which Washington has, in reality, no
military or political control.
Bush even appeared oblivious of the current sectarian map of Iraq. "The
Prime Minister made clear that splitting his country into parts, as some
have suggested, is not what the Iraqi people want, and that any partition of
Iraq would only lead to an increase in sectarian violence," he said. "I
agree." But Iraq is already "split into parts". The fracture of Iraq is
virtually complete, its chasms sucking in corpses at the rate of up to a
thousand a day.
Even Hitler must chuckle at this bloodbath, he who claimed in April 1945
that Germany would still win the Second World War, boasting that his enemy,
Roosevelt, had died - much as Bush boasted of Zarqawi's killing - while
demanding to know when General Wenck's mythical army would rescue the people
of Berlin. How many "Wencks" are going to be summoned from the 82nd Airborne
or the Marine Corps to save Bush from Iraq in the coming weeks? No, Bush is
not Hitler. Like Blair, he once thought he was Winston Churchill, a man who
never - ever - lied to his people about Britain's defeats in war. But
fantasy knows no bounds.
© 2006 Independent News and Media Limited